Lower Data Center Energy Costs in Illinois

Illinois' data center market—anchored by Chicago's position as a major fiber hub, strategic Midwest location, and competitive power costs—hosts 50+ facilities ranging from 350 Cermak's historic carrier hotel to multi-building hyperscale campuses consuming 50-100+ MW. With electricity representing 60-70% of total operating costs for data centers and colocation providers, strategic energy management directly impacts profitability, competitiveness, and customer acquisition.

This comprehensive guide explores proven strategies for reducing Illinois data center power rates, addressing PUE optimization through infrastructure efficiency, green energy procurement meeting ESG commitments, managing heat through HVAC optimization, and leveraging Illinois' top 5 data center market position. We demonstrate how facilities consistently achieve 25-40% energy cost reductions while improving reliability and sustainability.

---

Sources:

• Uptime Institute - Data Center Energy Efficiency
• U.S. Department of Energy - Data Center Best Practices
• Digital Realty Trust - Sustainability Reports

PUE Explained: Reducing Your Power Usage Effectiveness Ratio

Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) has become the industry standard metric for measuring data center energy efficiency, providing objective comparison across facilities and tracking improvement over time. Understanding PUE components and implementing optimization strategies enables substantial cost reduction while improving operational performance.

Understanding PUE Calculation

PUE Formula: PUE = Total Facility Energy / IT Equipment Energy

Component Breakdown:

Total Facility Energy includes:

• IT equipment (servers, storage, network): 50-65% of total
• Cooling systems (CRAC/CRAH units, chillers, cooling towers): 30-40%
• Power distribution (UPS, PDUs, transformers): 5-10%
• Lighting and other: 2-5%

PUE Interpretation:

• PUE 3.0: Very inefficient (legacy facilities, poor cooling)
• PUE 2.0: Below average (typical older facilities)
• PUE 1.6-1.8: Industry average (room for improvement)
• PUE 1.3-1.5: Good (well-optimized traditional cooling)
• PUE 1.1-1.2: Excellent (hyperscale, advanced cooling, ideal climate)
• PUE 1.05: Theoretical minimum (nearly perfect)

Example - Illinois Data Center PUE Improvement:

Baseline Facility:

• IT Load: 5 MW
• Total Facility Load: 8.5 MW
• PUE: 8.5 / 5.0 = 1.70
• Annual energy consumption: 8.5 MW × 8,760 hrs = 74,460 MWh
• Annual energy cost: 74,460 MWh × $65/MWh = $4.84M

Optimized Facility:

• IT Load: 5 MW (unchanged)
• Total Facility Load: 6.5 MW (cooling and distribution efficiency)
• PUE: 6.5 / 5.0 = 1.30
• Annual energy consumption: 6.5 MW × 8,760 hrs = 56,940 MWh
• Annual energy cost: 56,940 MWh × $65/MWh = $3.70M
• Annual savings: $1.14M (24% reduction)

Cooling System Optimization for PUE Reduction

Cooling typically represents the largest non-IT energy consumption, offering substantial optimization potential:

Cold Aisle Temperature Optimization:

Traditional data centers operate cold aisles at 68-70°F based on outdated equipment specifications. Modern servers operate reliably at higher temperatures:

• ASHRAE A2 recommended range: 64.4-80.6°F supply air temperature
• ASHRAE A3 allowable range: 59-89.6°F
• Common practice: 68-72°F (conservative)
• Optimized practice: 75-80°F (within specifications)

Impact of Temperature Increase:

• Each 1°F supply air temperature increase reduces cooling energy ~2-5%
• Raising from 70°F to 77°F (7°F increase) = 14-35% cooling energy reduction
• For 2 MW cooling load, this saves $180,000-450,000 annually

Implementation Considerations:

• Gradual temperature increase (1-2°F per week) monitoring for issues
• Hot spot detection using thermal monitoring
• Server reliability tracking confirming no impact
• Most facilities successfully operate at 75-80°F with proper airflow management

Hot Aisle Containment:

Preventing hot exhaust air from mixing with cold supply air dramatically improves cooling efficiency:

Benefits:

• Eliminates hot spots from air mixing
• Enables higher cold aisle temperatures
• Reduces bypass airflow (overcooling causing energy waste)
• Increases cooling capacity without adding equipment
• Reduces fan energy through better air utilization

ROI: Containment costs $50-150 per rack (curtains/doors) to $200-500 per rack (rigid containment). Payback: 6-24 months through reduced cooling energy and potential capacity expansion deferral.

Air-Side Economizers (Free Cooling):

Illinois climate enables substantial free cooling through air-side economizers:

Chicago Climate Data:

• Annual average temperature: 50°F
• Hours below 55°F: ~5,500 hours (63% of year)
• Hours below 65°F: ~7,200 hours (82% of year)
• Ideal for economizer operation

Economizer Operation: When outside air temperature is below set point (typically 55-65°F), mechanical cooling is bypassed. Outside air is filtered and humidity-controlled, then delivered directly to cold aisles.

Energy Savings:

• Economizer hours: 5,500 annually at 55°F setpoint
• Mechanical cooling reduction: 60-80% during economizer operation
• Annual cooling energy savings: 35-50%
• For 2 MW cooling load: $450,000-650,000 annual savings
• Investment: $500,000-1.2M for economizer retrofit
• Payback: 1-3 years

Variable Speed Fan Control:

Traditional CRAC units operate fans at constant speed regardless of actual cooling demand. Variable frequency drives (VFDs) modulate fan speed based on temperature and pressure requirements:

Benefits:

• Fan energy follows cube law: 20% speed reduction = 49% energy reduction
• Typical savings: 30-50% of fan energy
• For facility with 200 kW fan load: $85,000-140,000 annual savings
• Investment: $3,000-8,000 per VFD
• Payback: <1 year typical

Power Distribution Efficiency

Power distribution losses from utility interconnection to server racks consume 5-10% of total facility energy:

High-Efficiency UPS Systems:

Modern UPS systems achieve 96-98% efficiency vs. 90-92% for older systems:

Example - 5 MW IT Load:

• Legacy UPS (92% efficient): 5.0 MW / 0.92 = 5.43 MW input (0.43 MW loss)
• Modern UPS (97% efficient): 5.0 MW / 0.97 = 5.15 MW input (0.15 MW loss)
• Savings: 0.28 MW = 2,453 MWh annually = $159,000

Medium Voltage Distribution:

Distributing power at 12-15kV vs. 480V reduces transformation stages and I²R losses in conductors:

Benefits:

• Reduced number of transformations (each ~2-3% loss)
• Lower conductor losses from reduced current
• Smaller, less expensive distribution equipment
• Typical distribution efficiency improvement: 1-3%

Case Study: Illinois Colocation Facility PUE Improvement

Facility Profile:

• 120,000 sq ft, 8 MW IT capacity, 85% utilized (6.8 MW)
• Baseline PUE: 1.68
• Total facility load: 11.4 MW
• Annual energy cost: $6.5M

Optimization Program:

Phase 1: Temperature and Airflow (Year 1):

• Hot aisle containment throughout facility
• Cold aisle temperature increased from 70°F to 77°F
• Blanking panels on all empty rack positions
• Cable management improving airflow
• Investment: $485,000
• PUE improvement: 1.68 → 1.52 (9.5% reduction)
• Savings: $620,000 annually
• Payback: 9.4 months

Phase 2: Economizer Installation (Year 2):

• Air-side economizer with humidity control
• Building automation integration
• Particulate filtration for outside air
• Investment: $875,000
• PUE improvement: 1.52 → 1.38 (9.2% additional reduction)
• Savings: $625,000 annually (additional)
• Payback: 16.8 months

Phase 3: Fan and UPS Optimization (Year 3):

• VFDs on 24 CRAC unit fans
• UPS system replacement (92% → 97% efficiency)
• Lighting LED retrofit and controls
• Investment: $425,000
• PUE improvement: 1.38 → 1.30 (5.8% additional reduction)
• Savings: $390,000 annually (additional)
• Payback: 13.1 months

Total Results:

• Total investment: $1.785M
• Annual savings: $1.635M (25% cost reduction)
• PUE improvement: 1.68 → 1.30 (22.6% improvement)
• Simple payback: 13.1 months
• Additional benefits: 1.6 MW capacity gain without new infrastructure, improved reliability, enhanced customer satisfaction

Green Energy Procurement: Meeting ESG Goals

Data center operators face increasing pressure from customers, investors, and regulators to operate sustainably. Green energy procurement enables facilities to meet renewable energy commitments while managing costs and demonstrating environmental leadership.

Corporate Renewable Energy Drivers

Customer Requirements: Major enterprises (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple) require data center providers to match their consumption with renewable energy. Facilities without credible renewable energy programs lose competitive opportunities in hyperscale and enterprise markets.

Investor Expectations: ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics increasingly influence:

• Access to capital and financing terms
• Valuation multiples for public companies and M&A transactions
• Institutional investor allocation decisions
• Credit ratings and bond pricing

Regulatory Trends: While Illinois currently lacks mandatory renewable requirements for data centers, proactive procurement anticipates:

• Potential carbon pricing or emissions regulations
• Customer reporting requirements under scope 3 emissions accounting
• Municipal renewable energy requirements (Chicago exploring options)

Operational Benefits: Beyond compliance, renewable energy delivers:

• Long-term price certainty through fixed-price PPAs
• Hedge against fossil fuel price volatility
• Marketing differentiation in competitive markets
• Employee attraction and retention

Renewable Energy Procurement Strategies

On-Site Solar:

Limited by land availability and building structures, but viable for some Illinois facilities:

Feasibility:

• Roof-mounted: Structural capacity, roof condition, available area
• Ground-mounted: Land availability, interconnection proximity, zoning approval
• Carport solar: Parking lot coverage providing dual benefits

Economics:

• System cost: $1.50-2.50/W installed
• Federal ITC: 30% tax credit
• Illinois Adjustable Block Program: $30-50/MWh SRECs
• Self-consumption value: $55-75/MWh (avoiding retail purchase)
• Typical payback: 6-10 years for well-sited projects

Limitations:

• Illinois solar capacity factor: 14-16% (1,225-1,400 kWh/kW annually)
• Data centers operate 24/7 but solar generates during day only
• Typical roof solar covers 8-15% of facility consumption
• Meaningful but insufficient for 100% renewable goals

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs):

Long-term contracts (10-20 years) for off-site wind or solar projects:

Structure:

• Data center commits to purchase specific MW quantity or percentage of consumption
• Fixed or floating price structure (typically $25-45/MWh for wind, $30-50/MWh for solar)
• Delivery into ComEd or Ameren territory via PJM/MISO markets
• Physical delivery or financial hedging structure

Illinois Wind Resources:

• Northern and Central Illinois: Excellent wind resources
• Multiple operating wind farms and development pipeline
• Capacity factors: 35-42% (higher than solar, better 24/7 coverage)

Benefits:

• 100% renewable matching achievable
• Long-term price certainty
• Financial hedge against market volatility
• Direct correlation to specific renewable project (tangible story)
• RECs included with energy delivery

Considerations:

• Requires substantial credit support or parent guarantee
• 10-20 year commitment may exceed facility planning horizon
• Volumetric risk if facility load differs from contracted amount
• Complexity of contract negotiation and management

Renewable Energy Credits (RECs):

Purchase RECs separately from electricity supply:

Mechanism:

• Each REC represents 1 MWh of renewable generation
• Purchase RECs matching facility consumption
• Electricity physically delivered remains standard grid mix
• RECs provide attribute of renewable generation

Pricing:

• Unbundled RECs: $1-5/MWh (commodity RECs)
• Illinois-specific RECs: $25-50/MWh (Illinois Adjustable Block Program)
• Premium RECs: $10-25/MWh (specific project or vintage)

Benefits:

• Lowest cost option for renewable claims
• Flexibility (purchase annually without long-term commitment)
• No volumetric risk (match actual consumption)
• Simple implementation

Limitations:

• Perceived as less credible than PPAs
• Doesn't drive new renewable development (with commodity RECs)
• No price hedge (electricity still procured separately at market rates)

ComEd/Ameren Green Tariffs:

Utility programs enabling renewable energy procurement:

ComEd Renewable Energy Procurement:

• Aggregated renewable energy purchases
• Customer pays premium above standard rates
• Simplifies procurement vs. bilateral PPAs
• Available for loads >500 kW

Benefits:

• Utility manages renewable project development and contracting
• No long-term commitment required
• Simplified administration
• Credible renewable claim

Pricing:

• Typically $5-15/MWh premium above standard supply rates
• More expensive than PPAs but simpler and more flexible

Renewable Energy Implementation Strategy

Step 1: Establish Goals (Month 1-2)

• Define renewable energy targets (% of consumption, timing)
• Identify drivers (customer requirements, corporate commitments, market positioning)
• Establish budget and acceptable pricing range
• Determine acceptable implementation complexity

Step 2: Evaluate Options (Month 3-4)

• Assess on-site solar feasibility (structural, zoning, economics)
• Model PPA economics and risks
• Evaluate REC market pricing and availability
• Consider utility green tariff programs

Step 3: Procurement (Month 5-12)

• Issue RFPs for preferred approach
• Evaluate proposals on price, terms, risk, credibility
• Negotiate contracts and finalize terms
• Execute agreements

Step 4: Implementation and Verification (Ongoing)

• Track renewable energy delivery against consumption
• Verify REC retirement and maintain documentation
• Report renewable achievements to customers and stakeholders
• Review and optimize strategy annually

Managing Heat: HVAC Optimization Strategies

Data center cooling represents 30-45% of total facility energy consumption. Systematic HVAC optimization reduces costs while improving reliability and capacity utilization.

Cooling Architecture Evaluation

Air-Cooled CRAC/CRAH Systems:

Most common in colocation and small-medium enterprise facilities:

Optimization Opportunities:

• Hot aisle containment (discussed previously)
• Supply air temperature optimization (70°F → 77°F)
• Return air temperature monitoring (target 85-95°F for efficient operation)
• VFDs on fans
• Economizer integration
• Bypass airflow elimination (proper sealing and airflow management)

Water-Cooled Chiller Systems:

Typical for larger facilities (>5 MW):

System Components:

• Chillers: Generate chilled water (typically 45-50°F)
• Computer room air handlers (CRAH): Distribute cold air
• Cooling towers: Reject heat to atmosphere
• Pumps: Circulate chilled water and condenser water

Optimization Strategies:

Chilled Water Temperature Optimization:

• Raise chilled water supply temperature from 45°F to 50-55°F
• Reduces chiller energy 10-20%
• Requires verification of adequate cooling capacity at higher temperatures
• Some facilities successfully operate at 60°F with proper design

Cooling Tower Free Cooling (Waterside Economizer):

• When outside air wet-bulb temperature is sufficiently low, cooling towers can provide chilled water directly
• Bypasses mechanical chillers during favorable weather
• Illinois climate enables 3,500-5,000 hours annually of partial/full free cooling
• Reduces chiller operation 40-60%

Variable Speed Drives on Pumps and Fans:

• Chilled water pumps: VFDs save 20-40% pump energy
• Condenser water pumps: VFDs save 15-30% pump energy
• Cooling tower fans: VFDs save 30-50% fan energy
• Combined savings: $150,000-400,000 annually for 5 MW cooling load

Chiller Plant Optimization:

• Sequence multiple chillers for optimal efficiency
• Stage chillers based on actual load vs. running all at partial load
• Monitor and maintain condenser performance (fouling reduces efficiency 10-20%)
• Optimize condenser water temperature (balance chiller efficiency vs. tower/pump energy)

Liquid Cooling for High-Density Applications

Rack power densities exceeding 15-20 kW challenge traditional air cooling:

Liquid Cooling Technologies:

Rear Door Heat Exchangers:

• Install heat exchanger on rack rear door
• Captures server exhaust air, cools via chilled water
• Transparent to IT equipment (no server modifications)
• Handles 20-30 kW per rack
• Cost: $5,000-10,000 per rack
• Enables higher density without increasing CRAC capacity

Direct-to-Chip Liquid Cooling:

• Cold plates attached directly to processors
• Captures heat at source with minimal air cooling required
• Handles 50+ kW per rack
• Requires server modification/liquid-ready equipment
• Higher upfront cost but dramatic efficiency improvement
• PUE approaching 1.1-1.15 possible

Immersion Cooling:

• Servers submerged in dielectric fluid
• Most efficient cooling (PUE 1.05-1.10 achievable)
• Eliminates fans, reduces equipment failures
• Requires specialized servers and operational procedures
• Emerging technology with limited deployment

Economics of Liquid Cooling:

For hyperscale facility planning 80 kW average rack density:

Traditional Air Cooling:

• Requires extensive CRAC infrastructure
• PUE: 1.5-1.6 achievable
• CapEx: Lower server costs, higher facility costs

Rear Door Heat Exchangers:

• Reduces CRAC requirements ~50%
• PUE: 1.3-1.4 achievable
• CapEx: $500k for 100 racks + reduced facility cooling
• OpEx savings: $650k/year for 5 MW IT load
• Payback: <1 year

Direct-to-Chip:

• Minimizes air cooling requirements (only motherboard components)
• PUE: 1.15-1.25 achievable
• CapEx: $1.2M for 100 racks (servers + infrastructure) + reduced facility cooling
• OpEx savings: $1.1M/year for 5 MW IT load
• Payback: 1.5-2 years
• Additional benefits: Enables higher rack densities, improved equipment reliability

Illinois Climate Advantages for Cooling

Illinois' continental climate creates favorable conditions for data center cooling efficiency:

Temperature Profile:

• Cold winters: Extensive free cooling opportunities (5,500+ hours annually)
• Moderate summers: Peak cooling demands lower than hot climates (Arizona, Texas)
• Shoulder seasons: Optimal economizer operation

Humidity:

• Moderate humidity vs. coastal regions reduces dehumidification loads
• Winter air requires humidification (typical for northern climates)

Comparison to Other Major Markets:

Market	Annual Avg Temp	Cooling Degree Days	Heating Degree Days	Free Cooling Hours
Chicago, IL	50°F	800	6,500	5,500
Phoenix, AZ	75°F	4,300	1,300	2,800
Dallas, TX	67°F	2,900	2,400	3,900
Ashburn, VA	56°F	1,400	4,200	4,600
Silicon Valley, CA	60°F	200	2,600	6,200

Illinois ranks favorably for overall cooling efficiency, particularly when considering summer peak demand (sizing/CapEx) and free cooling hours (OpEx).

Why Illinois is a Top 5 Data Center Market

Illinois, particularly Chicagoland, ranks among the top U.S. data center markets driven by strategic location, robust infrastructure, competitive costs, and favorable business environment. Understanding these advantages enables operators to maximize benefits through strategic facility siting, procurement optimization, and infrastructure leverage.

Geographic and Network Advantages

Central U.S. Location:

• Low latency to major population centers (50ms or less to 75% of U.S. population)
• Midwest hub for east-west network traffic
• Proximity to major enterprises (financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, logistics)

Fiber Infrastructure:

• 350 Cermak (Chicago): Historic carrier hotel with 70+ carriers
• Multiple fiber routes to coastal markets
• Redundant network paths reducing single points of failure
• Continued investment in fiber infrastructure serving suburbs (Aurora, Elk Grove Village, Joliet)

Transportation Access:

• O'Hare International Airport: Direct flights enabling hands-on management
• Interstate highways: I-90, I-294, I-88, I-55, I-80 providing equipment transport
• Rail: Major intermodal center for freight and logistics

Power Infrastructure and Costs

ComEd System Capabilities:

• Robust transmission network supporting 50-100 MW individual facilities
• Multiple 345kV and 138kV lines providing redundancy
• Proven track record serving hyperscale deployments
• Proactive infrastructure investment supporting growth

Competitive Power Costs:

• PJM market competition driving wholesale prices
• Illinois rates competitive vs. coastal markets (25-40% below NYC/SF)
• Stable long-term pricing vs. markets with capacity constraints

Rate Comparison (All-in industrial rates, $/MWh):

Market	Average Rate	vs. Illinois
Illinois (Chicago area)	$65-75	Baseline
Silicon Valley, CA	$95-125	+45-67%
New York/New Jersey	$90-110	+38-47%
Northern Virginia	$70-85	+8-13%
Dallas/Fort Worth	$70-90	+8-20%
Phoenix, AZ	$75-95	+15-27%

For 25 MW average facility (219,000 MWh annually), Illinois cost advantage of $15-30/MWh equals $3.3M-6.6M annual savings vs. coastal markets.

Real Estate and Development

Available Land and Buildings:

• Suburban Chicago: Substantial industrial land availability
• Existing industrial buildings convertible to data center use
• New construction sites with utility proximity

Development Costs:

• Land: $100,000-300,000 per acre (vs. $500k-2M+ in constrained markets)
• Construction: $8-12M per MW build cost (shell, sitework, power, cooling)
• Renovation: $5-8M per MW for existing building conversions

Zoning and Permitting:

• Pro-business municipal governments (Aurora, Elk Grove Village, Joliet)
• Streamlined permitting for economic development projects
• Tax incentives and abatements for major investments

Labor and Operations

Skilled Workforce:

• Large pool of data center technicians and engineers
• Universities providing IT and engineering talent
• Lower labor costs vs. coastal markets (20-30% salary differential)

Operating Cost Structure:

• Total cost of ownership 15-25% lower than coastal alternatives
• Enables competitive colocation pricing while maintaining margins

Economic Development Support

ComEd Economic Development:

• Account management for large loads
• Infrastructure capacity analysis and planning
• Rate structure optimization
• Energy efficiency incentive coordination

Municipal Incentives:

• Tax increment financing (TIF) for infrastructure
• Property tax abatements (10-20 year terms typical)
• Sales tax exemptions on equipment
• Expedited permitting and fee waivers

State Programs:

• Illinois EDGE tax credits for job creation
• Data center equipment sales tax exemption (equipment >$250M)
• Enterprise zones with additional benefits

Market Growth and Momentum

Recent Developments:

• Multiple hyperscale campus announcements (2020-2025)
• Colocation provider expansion (Digital Realty, QTS, Aligned, CyrusOne)
• Enterprise migration from on-premise to colocation
• Cloud region availability supporting hybrid strategies

Future Outlook:

• Continued capacity addition (500+ MW pipeline)
• Renewable energy availability supporting ESG requirements
• 5G infrastructure investment driving edge computing demand
• AI/ML workload growth requiring substantial compute capacity

Get Expert Help for Illinois Data Center Energy Optimization

Final Recommendations for Illinois Data Center Energy Management

Illinois data center operators face both exceptional opportunities and competitive imperatives for energy cost optimization. The combination of competitive power costs, favorable climate, robust infrastructure, and comprehensive incentive programs enables facilities to achieve world-class energy efficiency while maintaining reliability and supporting growth.

Key Success Factors:

PUE as Primary Metric: Establish baseline PUE through detailed metering, set aggressive improvement targets (move toward 1.3 or better), and track monthly performance. Every 0.1 PUE improvement at 5 MW IT load saves $280,000 annually.

Climate-Appropriate Design: Illinois climate enables 5,500+ hours of free cooling annually. Facilities not leveraging economizers leave $500,000-1M+ annually on the table. New construction should design for economizer operation; existing facilities should evaluate retrofit economics.

Temperature Optimization: Raising supply air temperatures from 68-70°F to 75-80°F (within ASHRAE guidelines) reduces cooling energy 20-30% with zero capital investment. Implement gradually with monitoring to verify reliability.

Renewable Energy Strategy: Develop clear renewable energy goals aligned with customer requirements and corporate commitments. Evaluate all procurement options (PPAs, RECs, green tariffs, on-site solar) selecting approach balancing credibility, cost, and operational complexity.

Liquid Cooling Evaluation: For high-density deployments (>15 kW/rack average), liquid cooling technologies deliver compelling economics through reduced facility infrastructure and improved PUE. Early evaluation in planning process enables optimal design.

Continuous Optimization: Leading facilities implement ongoing commissioning programs, monthly PUE tracking, equipment performance monitoring, and regular assessments of new technology opportunities. Energy efficiency is not one-time project but continuous operational discipline.

Leverage Market Position: Illinois' top-5 market status creates advantages through infrastructure investment, competitive vendor pricing, available expertise, and customer demand. Facilities maximizing these benefits achieve superior competitive positioning.

Illinois data center operators implementing these strategies consistently achieve 25-40% energy cost reductions vs. baseline operations while improving reliability, capacity utilization, and sustainability performance. Start today by establishing PUE baseline monitoring, requesting ComEd/Ameren data center assessments, and evaluating economizer feasibility for your facility. The technology is proven, the incentives are substantial, and competitive advantage demands action.