Lower Heavy Manufacturing Energy Costs in Aurora

Aurora's evolution from traditional manufacturing to tech-forward industrial operations creates unique energy management opportunities combining precision manufacturing, automated assembly, and sustainable energy systems. As Illinois' second-largest city and anchor of the Fox Valley/I-88 tech corridor, Aurora's 400+ manufacturing facilities employ 25,000+ workers in operations ranging from precision machining and electronics assembly to pharmaceutical manufacturing and food processing.

This comprehensive guide explores energy optimization for Aurora industrial electricity rates, covering strategies for powering tech-forward manufacturers efficiently, implementing solar and battery storage for industrial parks, reducing idle load in assembly lines, and leveraging Aurora's tech corridor energy mix. We demonstrate how facilities consistently achieve 20-35% energy cost reductions while advancing sustainability goals.

---

Sources:

• City of Aurora Economic Development
• ComEd Renewable Energy Programs
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Industrial Solar

Optimizing Power for Tech-Forward Manufacturers

Aurora's manufacturing sector increasingly emphasizes technology integration, automation, precision operations, and advanced materials—creating energy profiles distinct from traditional heavy industry. Understanding how to efficiently power these sophisticated operations requires specialized approaches addressing power quality, equipment efficiency, and operational optimization.

Tech-Forward Manufacturing Characteristics

Precision Manufacturing:

• CNC machining centers with multi-axis control requiring stable power
• Coordinate measuring machines (CMM) with sub-micron precision
• Laser cutting and welding systems sensitive to voltage variations
• Clean room environments with stringent environmental controls

Electronics and Medical Device Assembly:

• Automated pick-and-place equipment with high-speed operations
• Surface mount technology (SMT) lines requiring precise thermal profiles
• Testing and inspection equipment with sensitive electronics
• Cleanroom HVAC maintaining strict temperature/humidity/particulate control

Pharmaceutical and Bio-Manufacturing:

• Process vessels with precise temperature and agitation control
• Sterile environments requiring continuous HVAC operation
• Laboratory and quality control equipment with 24/7 operation
• Regulatory compliance driving documentation and control systems

Advanced Materials Processing:

• Composite manufacturing with controlled curing environments
• Specialty coatings requiring precise application conditions
• Material testing and development laboratories
• Pilot production facilities with flexible operations

Energy Consumption Drivers in Tech Manufacturing

Power Quality Requirements:

Tech-forward operations demand higher power quality than traditional manufacturing:

Voltage Stability: Many precision manufacturing operations require voltage within ±3% of nominal (114-120V on 120V circuits, 456-504V on 480V). Voltage sags or swells disrupt controls, affect product quality, or damage sensitive equipment.

Harmonic Distortion: Variable frequency drives, switching power supplies, and electronic equipment create harmonic distortion. Total harmonic distortion (THD) should remain below 5% for sensitive operations, requiring harmonic filters or isolation transformers.

Power Factor: While important for all manufacturing, tech operations with extensive control systems and electronics typically have lower natural power factor (0.70-0.85) requiring correction to avoid utility penalties and maximize system efficiency.

Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS): Critical manufacturing processes, data systems, and control equipment often require UPS backup providing clean, stable power during utility disturbances. UPS systems consume 5-15% additional energy through conversion losses and battery charging.

Energy Efficiency in Modern Manufacturing

Automated Assembly Lines:

Modern automated assembly combines robots, conveyors, vision systems, and controls consuming 300-1,200 kW depending on line complexity and speed. Energy optimization opportunities include:

Idle Mode Management: Assembly lines often idle during breaks, changeovers, material shortages, or quality holds while continuing to consume 20-40% of full-load power. Implementing automatic shutdown after 10-15 minutes of idle saves $25,000-75,000 annually for typical lines.

Vision System LED Lighting: Machine vision inspection uses LED strobes and backlighting. Optimizing light intensity to minimum effective levels and scheduling illumination only during inspection cycles reduces consumption 30-50% vs. continuous operation.

Conveyor System Optimization: VFDs on conveyor motors allow speed matching to production rate. Operating conveyors at 75% speed during low-throughput periods reduces energy consumption following cube-law relationship (25% speed reduction = 40% energy reduction).

Vacuum and Pneumatic Systems: Pick-and-place operations consume compressed air and vacuum. Optimizing pressure settings, repairing leaks, and adding storage capacity for variable demand reduces compressor/vacuum pump operation 25-35%.

Cleanroom Energy Intensity:

Pharmaceutical, medical device, and electronics manufacturing cleanrooms consume 3-10× more energy per square foot than conventional manufacturing space:

HVAC Requirements:

• 100% outside air with no recirculation
• 15-60 air changes per hour (vs. 2-6 for conventional space)
• Precise temperature control (±1-2°F)
• Low humidity (30-50% RH) requiring substantial dehumidification
• HEPA filtration with high pressure drop

Energy Consumption Example (10,000 sq ft Class 100,000 cleanroom):

• HVAC: 400-600 kW continuous = 3.5-5.3M kWh annually
• Lighting: 40-60 kW continuous = 350-525k kWh annually
• Process equipment: 150-300 kW variable = 750k-1.5M kWh annually
• Total: 4.6-7.3M kWh annually ($300,000-475,000 at $0.065/kWh)

Cleanroom Optimization Strategies:

• Right-size air changes to actual cleanliness requirements (many cleanrooms over-ventilated)
• Implement variable air volume systems responding to real-time particle counts
• Optimize temperature and humidity setpoints within allowable ranges
• Use energy recovery ventilators capturing heat/cooling from exhaust air
• LED lighting with occupancy sensors in ancillary areas
• Demand-controlled ventilation in gowning areas and airlocks

Power Quality Solutions for Sensitive Operations

Voltage Regulation:

Facilities requiring tight voltage control should implement:

Ferroresonant Transformers: Provide ±1% voltage regulation regardless of input variations. Cost: $2,000-8,000 per transformer depending on capacity. Applications: Critical control panels, precision equipment, sensitive instruments.

Electronic Voltage Regulators: Faster response than ferroresonant, provide ±0.5% regulation. Cost: $3,000-12,000. Applications: High-precision machining, measurement equipment, process control systems.

Isolation Transformers: Separate sensitive loads from utility system noise and harmonics. Cost: $1,500-6,000. Applications: Clean power for controls, computers, laboratory equipment.

Harmonic Mitigation:

Passive Harmonic Filters: Tuned LC filters targeting specific harmonic frequencies (5th, 7th, 11th common from VFDs). Cost: $8,000-25,000. Benefit: Reduces THD from 15-25% to 3-8%.

Active Harmonic Filters: Monitor harmonics in real-time and inject compensating currents. Cost: $15,000-50,000. Benefit: Reduces THD to <3% across all frequencies.

UPS Systems:

Critical manufacturing processes may justify UPS protection:

• Short-duration (5-15 minutes) bridging utility disturbances until generators start
• Medium-duration (30-60 minutes) allowing controlled shutdown of processes
• Long-duration (2-4 hours) enabling continued operation during extended outages

UPS Economics:

• Capital cost: $400-800 per kW capacity plus installation
• Operating cost: 5-10% additional energy consumption from conversion losses
• Benefit: Prevention of production interruptions, product losses, equipment damage
• Typical payback: 2-5 years for facilities with >$50k/hour downtime cost

Solar & Battery Storage for Industrial Parks

Aurora's location in northern Illinois (41.7° latitude) provides excellent solar resource with 4.2-4.5 peak sun hours daily averaged annually. Combined with federal Investment Tax Credit (30%), declining equipment costs, and supportive Illinois policies, on-site solar with battery storage creates compelling economics for manufacturing facilities while advancing corporate sustainability objectives.

Solar PV Economics for Aurora Manufacturing

Solar Resource:

• Annual insolation: 1,540-1,600 kWh/kW installed capacity
• Seasonal variation: 2.5× summer production vs. winter
• Best orientation: South-facing, 35-40° tilt for annual optimization
• Space requirement: 100-120 sq ft per kW (roof) or 150-200 sq ft per kW (ground)

System Sizing for Manufacturing:

Facilities should size solar arrays considering:

• Available roof area or land for ground-mount systems
• Current electricity consumption and load profile
• Budget and financing availability
• Utility interconnection limits and requirements
• Desire for energy independence vs. grid-tied operation

Sizing Example - 200,000 sq ft Manufacturing Facility:

Baseline energy consumption: 2.5M kWh annually Available roof area: 150,000 sq ft (75% of building footprint) Feasible solar capacity: 1,000 kW (considering structural capacity, setbacks, HVAC equipment) Expected annual generation: 1,450 MWh (58% of facility consumption)

Project Economics:

• System cost: $2.0M installed ($2.00/W)
• Federal ITC (30%): -$600k
• SREC revenue: $45k annually (estimated)
• Electricity savings: $95k annually (1,450 MWh × $0.065/kWh)
• O&M costs: -$15k annually
• Net annual benefit: $125k
• Net investment after ITC: $1.4M
• Simple payback: 11.2 years
• 25-year NPV (6% discount): $1.1M positive

Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)

Pairing solar with battery storage enhances value through demand charge reduction, increased self-consumption, and resilience:

Battery System Capabilities:

• Store solar energy generated during midday for evening use
• Discharge during facility peak demand periods reducing demand charges
• Provide backup power during outages (with appropriate inverter/controls)
• Participate in utility demand response programs earning revenue
• Smooth solar output variability improving grid integration

Battery Economics - 500 kWh / 250 kW System:

• System cost: $350k installed ($700/kWh)
• Federal ITC (30% when paired with solar): -$105k
• Demand charge savings: $45k annually (reducing peak by 250 kW, $15/kW/month)
• Energy arbitrage value: $12k annually
• Demand response revenue: $8k annually
• Total annual benefit: $65k
• Net investment after ITC: $245k
• Simple payback: 3.8 years

Combined Solar + Storage Economics:

2.0M solar + 350k battery = $2.35M total investment Federal ITC 30% on both: -$705k Net investment: $1.645M Combined annual benefit: $125k solar + $65k battery = $190k Simple payback: 8.7 years 25-year NPV: $1.8M positive

Implementation Considerations

Structural Assessment:

Aurora's legacy industrial buildings require careful evaluation:

• Roof age and condition (target 15+ years remaining useful life)
• Structural capacity for solar array weight (3-5 lbs/sq ft)
• Seismic and wind load calculations per Illinois building code
• Roof penetrations and waterproofing methodology

Electrical Integration:

Interconnection Requirements:

• ComEd interconnection application and review
• Protective relays and disconnect switches per utility standards
• Bi-directional metering for net energy metering
• Power quality studies for large systems (>250kW)

Internal Distribution:

• Adequate transformer and panel capacity for solar inverter output
• Proper grounding and bonding per NEC Article 690
• Monitoring and controls integration
• Safety disconnects and lockout/tagout procedures

Financing Options:

Capital Purchase: Direct ownership capturing full ITC and depreciation benefits. Best for facilities with tax appetite and capital availability.

Power Purchase Agreement (PPA): Third-party ownership with facility purchasing electricity from solar at fixed rate (typically $0.03-0.05/kWh). No upfront cost but reduced lifetime savings. Best for facilities without tax appetite or capital.

Operating Lease: Facility leases system with option to purchase after ITC capture. Middle ground between purchase and PPA.

ComEd Solar Programs:

Adjustable Block Program: Illinois solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) providing revenue stream of $25-50/MWh generated over 15 years. Combined with energy savings creates compelling economics.

Community Solar: Alternative for facilities without adequate roof space. Purchase subscription to off-site solar array receiving bill credits for generation.

Reducing Idle Load in Assembly Lines

Idle load—equipment remaining energized but not actively producing—represents substantial hidden waste in Aurora's manufacturing operations, typically 15-25% of total equipment energy consumption. Systematic idle load reduction delivers rapid payback with minimal capital investment.

Quantifying Idle Load Waste

Typical Idle Power Consumption:

Equipment Type	Operating Load	Idle Load	Idle %
CNC Machining Center	25-45 kW	8-15 kW	30-35%
Robotic Assembly Cell	15-30 kW	5-10 kW	30-35%
Conveyor System	20-40 kW	8-15 kW	35-40%
Injection Molding Machine	30-60 kW	12-20 kW	35-40%
Industrial Robot	5-12 kW	2-4 kW	35-40%
Packaging Equipment	15-25 kW	6-10 kW	35-40%

Facility Idle Load Calculation:

Manufacturing facility with $400k annual electricity costs:

• Equipment operating 4,000 hours annually productive operation
• Equipment idle 2,000 hours annually (breaks, changeovers, delays, maintenance)
• Idle consumption at 35% of operating load
• Idle load cost: $400k × (2,000/6,000) × 0.35 = $47k wasted annually

For facilities with higher idle time percentages or more expensive electricity, waste often exceeds $75,000-150,000 annually.

Causes of Excess Idle Time

Operational Factors:

• Shift Breaks: Lunch and break periods with equipment remaining energized
• Changeovers: Equipment waiting between product runs during setup
• Material Delays: Production paused awaiting raw materials, components, or packaging
• Quality Issues: Line stoppages during quality investigations or rework
• Unbalanced Lines: Fast processes waiting for slow processes in linked operations
• Maintenance: Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance periods
• End-of-Shift: Equipment left running after shift end "to be ready" for next shift

Cultural/Behavioral Factors:

• Lack of awareness about idle energy consumption
• No incentive structure for energy conservation
• Belief that frequent start/stop damages equipment or wastes startup energy
• Convenience of leaving equipment ready vs. shutdown procedures
• Insufficient operator training on energy management

Idle Load Reduction Strategies

Automatic Shutdown Systems:

Implement timers or controls automatically powering down equipment after idle threshold:

Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Integration: Manufacturing equipment with PLCs can be programmed to enter low-power "sleep mode" after 10-30 minutes without production signal. Sleep mode reduces auxiliary systems (hydraulics, coolant pumps, pneumatics) while maintaining control power and position.

Cost: $2,000-8,000 per machine for PLC programming and interface Benefit: 60-80% idle load reduction during inactive periods Payback: 6-18 months typical

Standalone Timer Controls: For equipment without PLC capability, external timers can control auxiliary systems:

• Coolant pump timers: Shut off pumps after 15 minutes idle
• Hydraulic system timers: Reduce pump operation to minimum during idle
• Lighting timers: Turn off task lighting when equipment idle
• HVAC zone timers: Reduce conditioning in idle production areas

Cost: $200-1,000 per timer Benefit: 40-60% idle load reduction for controlled systems Payback: 2-6 months

Operator Training and Engagement:

Energy Awareness Training:

• Educate operators on idle load costs and environmental impact
• Provide guidelines for when shutdown is appropriate vs. remaining powered
• Train on equipment startup/shutdown procedures
• Establish energy conservation as part of standard operating procedures

Incentive Programs:

• Team-based incentives for achieving energy reduction targets
• Recognition programs highlighting energy-saving behaviors
• Gamification with real-time feedback and competitions between shifts/lines
• Incorporate energy metrics into performance reviews

Real-Time Visibility:

Equipment Energy Monitoring: Install sub-metering displaying equipment energy consumption in real-time:

• Dashboard visible to operators showing current power draw
• Color-coded indication: Green (productive), yellow (idle), red (unnecessary waste)
• Historical trending identifying problematic equipment or time periods
• Automated alerts when equipment idle exceeds thresholds

Cost: $1,500-5,000 per monitored load Benefit: 20-35% idle load reduction through visibility and awareness Payback: 8-24 months

Production Flow Optimization:

Reducing idle time improves both energy efficiency and productivity:

Line Balancing: Analyze cycle times for each production step. Rebalance line to minimize bottlenecks causing upstream processes to idle waiting for downstream processes.

Just-in-Time Material Delivery: Implement systems ensuring material availability minimizing production stoppages for material handling.

Rapid Changeover (SMED): Apply Single-Minute Exchange of Die principles reducing changeover time, allowing more frequent changeovers with less total idle time.

Predictive Maintenance: Schedule maintenance during planned downtime periods rather than reactive stoppages during production shifts.

Case Study: Aurora Electronics Assembly Facility

Facility Profile:

• 120,000 sq ft SMT assembly and testing
• 5 assembly lines, 12 test stations
• 2 shifts, 185 employees
• Annual energy cost: $285,000

Baseline Idle Analysis:

• Equipment operating 3,800 productive hours annually
• Equipment idle 2,400 hours annually (37% of powered-on time)
• Idle power consumption: 35% of operating load
• Idle load cost: $71,000 annually (25% of total electricity costs)

Implementation:

1. Automatic Shutdown on Assembly Lines: PLC programming implementing 15-minute idle timer shutting down conveyors, vacuum systems, and auxiliary equipment. Investment: $28,000 (5 lines × $5,600)

2. Test Station Energy Monitoring: Real-time displays showing equipment power consumption with operator training on shutdown protocols. Investment: $18,000 (12 stations × $1,500)

3. Production Scheduling Optimization: Batching work to minimize changeover idle time and coordinating material deliveries. Investment: $5,000 (software and training)

4. Operator Engagement Program: Energy awareness training, team incentives, recognition program. Investment: $3,000

Results:

• Idle time reduced from 2,400 to 1,650 hours annually (31% reduction)
• Idle power consumption during remaining idle reduced from 35% to 22% through automatic shutdown
• Annual savings: $49,500 (70% of previous idle waste)
• Total investment: $54,000
• Simple payback: 13 months
• Additional benefits: Increased equipment available time, improved OEE, enhanced operator engagement

Aurora's Tech Corridor & Industrial Energy Mix

Aurora's position in the Fox Valley/I-88 tech corridor creates unique advantages for manufacturers combining advanced technology operations with strategic energy management. Understanding how to leverage this ecosystem enables competitive advantage through energy optimization, sustainability leadership, and operational excellence.

Tech Corridor Infrastructure and Ecosystem

Geographic Advantages:

• I-88 Corridor: Direct highway access connecting Aurora to Chicago O'Hare Airport (35 miles), Chicago downtown (40 miles), and Western Chicago suburbs
• Metra Rail: Commuter rail service providing workforce access from Chicago metropolitan area
• Fox River: Historical industrial development foundation and current recreational amenity supporting quality of life

Workforce and Education:

• Skilled Technical Workforce: Fox Valley region emphasis on precision manufacturing, automation, and technical operations
• Waubonsee Community College: Advanced manufacturing training programs and continuing education supporting industry needs
• Aurora University: Engineering and business programs providing talent pipeline
• Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy: Elite STEM education creating long-term regional technical capability

Business Environment:

• Lower Cost Structure: Industrial real estate, labor costs, and operating expenses 15-25% below downtown Chicago
• Pro-Business Government: Aurora economic development actively supporting manufacturing investment and job creation
• Established Manufacturing Cluster: Supplier networks, service providers, and industry associations supporting operations

Kane County and Aurora Energy Incentives

ComEd Economic Development Support:

• Priority account management for large industrial customers
• Infrastructure capacity analysis and planning support
• Fast-track interconnection for expansion projects
• Energy efficiency incentive coordination

Kane County Enterprise Zone: Benefits for qualifying projects:

• Building materials sales tax exemption (6.25% state + 1% county + local)
• Machinery/equipment sales tax exemption
• Investment tax credit (0.5% of qualified investment)
• Job creation tax credit ($500 per employee)
• Utility tax exemption (varies)

Aurora Economic Development Incentives:

• Tax increment financing (TIF) supporting infrastructure and facility improvements
• Fee waivers and expedited permitting for significant projects
• Workforce development grants supporting training programs
• Site preparation assistance for brownfield or challenging sites

Combined Incentive Example - New Tech Manufacturing Facility:

$25M project (land, building, equipment):

• Building materials: $8M eligible for tax exemption = $500k savings
• Manufacturing equipment: $10M eligible for tax exemption = $625k savings
• Energy efficiency equipment: $1.5M with 40% ComEd incentive = $600k grant
• Investment tax credit: $25M × 0.5% = $125k
• Job creation credit: 150 jobs × $500 = $75k
• Federal Section 179D: Building efficiency deduction = $400k tax benefit
• Total incentive value: $2.325M (9.3% of project cost)

Renewable Energy and Sustainability Leadership

Aurora manufacturers increasingly pursue renewable energy and sustainability objectives:

Corporate Sustainability Drivers:

• Customer Requirements: Major customers (automotive, electronics, consumer goods) requiring supplier sustainability commitments
• Investor Expectations: ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics influencing access to capital and valuation
• Employee Recruitment: Sustainability commitments attracting and retaining talent, particularly younger workers
• Operational Benefits: Energy efficiency delivering cost savings alongside environmental benefits
• Regulatory Anticipation: Preparing for potential carbon pricing or emissions regulations

Renewable Energy Procurement Options:

On-Site Solar: Direct ownership or PPA providing visible sustainability commitment, cost savings, and energy resilience. Best for facilities with adequate roof space or land.

Community Solar: Off-site solar subscription providing renewable energy credits without on-site installation. Flexible option for facilities with inadequate space or unsuitable buildings.

Renewable Energy Credits (RECs): Purchase RECs separately from electricity supply, matching consumption with renewable generation. Lowest-cost option but least tangible.

Green Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Long-term contracts for renewable energy from specific projects. Provides price certainty and strong sustainability credibility.

ComEd Green Pricing: Utility program adding premium to bills matched by renewable energy purchases. Simple but higher cost than other options.

Aurora Manufacturing Energy Success Story

Company: Precision Automation Equipment Manufacturer Facility: 175,000 sq ft, automated assembly and testing, 220 employees Baseline Annual Energy Cost: $375,000 (5.8M kWh electricity)

Comprehensive Energy Management Program:

Phase 1 - Efficiency Foundation (Year 1):

• LED lighting retrofit throughout facility (650 fixtures)
• HVAC economizers and controls optimization
• Compressed air system leak repair and storage addition
• Idle load reduction on 8 assembly lines
• Investment: $185,000 with $72,000 ComEd incentives = $113,000 net
• Annual savings: $82,000 (22% reduction)
• Payback: 16 months

Phase 2 - Advanced Systems (Year 2):

• Building automation system installation
• VFDs on major motors and HVAC equipment
• Cleanroom HVAC optimization (energy recovery, variable volume)
• Power factor correction and harmonic filtering
• Demand monitoring and management system
• Investment: $265,000 with $58,000 incentives = $207,000 net
• Additional annual savings: $61,000 (16% further reduction)
• Payback: 3.4 years

Phase 3 - Renewable Energy (Year 3):

• 350 kW rooftop solar array (525 MWh annual generation)
• 200 kWh / 100 kW battery storage system
• Investment: $850,000 with $255,000 federal ITC + $35,000 SRECs = $560,000 net
• Additional annual savings: $48,000 (solar + storage benefits)
• Payback: 11.7 years, 25-year NPV positive

Combined Results:

• Total investment: $1.3M gross, $880,000 net after incentives
• Total annual savings: $191,000 (51% reduction from baseline)
• Payback on net investment: 4.6 years
• Additional benefits: Enhanced sustainability profile, improved customer perception, employee engagement, energy resilience

Get Expert Help for Fox Valley Energy Optimization

Final Recommendations for Aurora Tech-Forward Manufacturing

Aurora's unique position in the Fox Valley tech corridor creates exceptional opportunities for manufacturers to achieve world-class energy performance while advancing technology leadership and sustainability goals. The combination of competitive costs, supportive business environment, available workforce, and comprehensive incentive programs enables manufacturers to invest in energy optimization delivering both financial returns and strategic benefits.

Key Success Factors:

Tech-Forward Approach: Leverage automation, controls, and monitoring technologies to optimize energy use in real-time. Manufacturing operations with sophisticated production technology should apply similar rigor to energy management systems.

Power Quality Investment: Precision manufacturing and automated operations justify investment in power quality solutions. Clean, stable power prevents production disruptions, quality issues, and equipment damage while optimizing energy efficiency.

Idle Load Elimination: Systematic idle load reduction delivers 20-35% energy cost reduction with minimal capital investment. The combination of automatic controls, operator training, and real-time monitoring creates sustainable behavior change.

Renewable Energy Integration: On-site solar with battery storage creates compelling economics when combining energy savings, demand charge reduction, federal ITC, and state incentives. Added benefits include sustainability leadership, energy resilience, and customer/employee engagement.

Comprehensive Incentive Capture: Facilities leaving money on the table through uncaptured incentives significantly reduce project ROI. ComEd programs, federal tax benefits, and local economic development incentives can offset 40-60% of energy project costs.

Continuous Optimization: Energy management is ongoing discipline, not one-time project. Leading facilities implement systematic monitoring, regular assessments, and continuous improvement processes maintaining energy cost leadership over time.

Aurora manufacturers implementing these strategies consistently achieve 25-35% energy cost reductions while improving operational efficiency, supporting sustainability goals, and enhancing competitive positioning. Start today by requesting a free ComEd energy assessment, conducting idle load analysis, and exploring solar feasibility for your facility. The technology is proven, the incentives are substantial, and competitive advantage awaits action.